BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Keith Benson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 May 2007 08:30:09 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
----- Original Message -----
From: Dee Lusby <[log in to unmask]>
> This is done
> basically because smaller flys faster, 

I would like to see the data that leads one to this conclusion.  I have 
heard it often enough, but would like to see the data.  

> meaning while
> smaller drones can ketch larger queens, it is harder for
> larger drones to ketch smaller queens in flight. So
> artificially enlarged LC queens and drones are then at a
> disadvantage in nature for always being pulled apart FWIW.

What are the determinants of the size of a queen cell?  It is often 
stated that queens with larger abdomens have more ovarioles and will 
produce more eggs.  How does that aquare with the desire for smaller 
queens?


Keith

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2