BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Date:
Thu, 2 May 2013 09:35:04 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
From:
Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
I invented the liquid nitrogen freeze method while working on a project for 
 EPA.  I found that neither the pin prick nor Steve Tabor's - cut and 
freeze  in freezer- produced consistent  results.  The problem is that  physical 
damage (pricking, cutting out bits of comb) can induce a repair  behavior.   
Hygenic behavior is supposedly  controlled by   two genes, each with a bit 
different behavior.    Also, removal  of paper is probably not a good test - 
its just part of a two step  process.
 
As per area of brood - the larger the area you  kill, the more certain  you 
will be to see bees take action - that's again not simply hygienic 
behavior,  but a response to a damage 'crisis'.   
 
What most have forgotten - our data showed that several small patches  over 
more than on brood frame provided the most reliable test.
 
Medhat followed up our work with his butter dish, and we did something  
similar with aluminum 'hockey' pucks.
 
Jerry
 
 
 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2