BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Birdwalk Farms <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Dec 1998 17:17:31 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
| the moment packers are not required to test honey AT ALL except as they see
| fit to protect their liability and they pay big insurance premiums and so
| they don't much care about testing for drug contamination or HFCS.
 
i am not really up-to -date on insurance issues, but might it be possible to
attack this through the premiums by showing the insurers the reduction of
exposure that could be made with proper, ongoing testing.  this would allow
differential premiums.
 
 
Dan & Laura at Birdwalk Farms

ATOM RSS1 RSS2