BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:04:26 -0800
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From:
Mike Stoops <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
I have recently heard that the longevity of insturmentally inseminated queens is not very long, normally being two or three months.  I would be interested in hearing from those of you who have had experience with II queens.  The reason I'm asking is that I am considering taking Sue Cobey's instrumental insemination course for the purpose of being able to provide queens of known genetics to the area beekeepers around me.  Taking this course is not inexpensive, along with the required equipment.  I don't want to go through this expense and then not be able to provide a product (II queens) that don't last for at least a year in the hive.  If I do this I think I can provide queens to my local people at a reasonable cost, not the $100+ that II queens are going for now as breeder queens.  My queens would be used as production queens.

Mike    Located in southwest Alabama

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2