BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Date:
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:15:23 +0000
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
This article says:

"Without neonics or a suitable replacement, farmers could face sizable losses. One industry study estimated the fallout at $5.78 billion<http://www.neonicreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/HFFA%20Report.pdf> per year in Europe alone—and many multiples of that if a ban is instituted in the US and other major agricultural economies, with the costs passed on to consumers."

Is there any evidence to back this up?  Studies previously posted on this list show that use/no use of neonics don't affect crop yield significantly.

Christina

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2