BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 7 Mar 2013 14:35:55 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
Re: Calculating Efficacy
From:
allen <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Organization:
Deep Thought
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
> Measuring efficacy can vary based on the definition of efficacy,
> your measured variable and experimental design.

Thanks.  This is quite interesting and goes to show that efficacy
numbers can indeed be apples and oranges.

What started us this time was wondering if your report on Hopguard here
recently that gave a 40% number was for each application, or for the
hives after all three applications.

Could you please clarify?

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2