> Anyway, I do not want to reopen discussion on that admittedly very flawed
> Harvard study.

 The only thing missing from the discussion was Dr. Lu.

>Who does? But evidently Dr. Lu is undaunted and is taking his show on the
>road:

Perhaps those on BEE-L which thought the study was so flawed might attend
and address their concerns on the study directly to Dr. Lu and report back.

I said back in the early days of concerns over *possible* problems with the 
neonics I
predicted a day in the future when people saying (like Bayer) *the neonics
are safe around bees* popular opinion would change and their position would
not be popular. To be honest only on BEE-L do I hear the Bayer position put
forth so strongly.

http://followthehoney.com/events/

When will the next Dr. Lu step forward?  The next study?

bob

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm