> Looks like the bar has been lowered pretty far for qualified writers.
>

Fortunately they are being monitored for scientific accuracy by the editor.
:)

I came to the conclusion that the real issue had nothing to do with Randy's
article but that she took issue with the title of his website-- scientific
beekeeping. That, of course is an assumption, but it fits her narrative
that Randy cannot claim the site is scientific when pure science requires
x,y and z, which she has.

I would venture that Randy has true peer review since he runs many of his
trials past this august group which has no trouble commenting and giving
their views. It appears the the ABJ only has one. Hence, his site is much
more scientific than the ABJ.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html