BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Fri, 31 Jul 2009 23:20:53 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: WSU Researchers Trace Sources of Bee Colony Collapse Disorder
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<E4161609FCC34B448BC1E6018826F44F@office>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
>
>  Peter, this caught my eye:

>Far fewer wax moths these days, but that is down to intolerance of wax
moths being one of my selection criteria.

I had no idea that selection for wax moth intolerance was ever a criterion!
In my experience, all EHB appear to be intolerant of wax moth.  Your
statement interests me greatly--have you, or others, noticed that there is
much variability in wax moth tolerance in various lines of bees?

Randy Oliver

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2