> Randy and I disagree on certain scientific points and we can not reach an agreement. This is exactly the reason why we added the disclaimer. His articles are not >peer reviewed and they have not been edited the way other articles in the journal are edited. The articles are Randy's interpretation of data and he does not wish >to accept some of my suggested edits to modify some statements. 


Fully understanding this point,  I would add simply that the current peer review process is questionable.  Take Dr. Lu work,  peer reviewed junk science. When your peers in science know math and process,  but not bees,  its not helpful.  Unfortunately we are full of Science that does not always apply in the field.


Randy may not get reviewed in that manner,  he gets reviewed in ground truth!  I will take that any day! The only key is the reader needs to remember it’s the CA foothills.


Charles

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html