BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robin Dartington <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Jan 2014 17:36:27 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Peter  wrote:>The biggest sticking point with inspection has always been that the law includes a provision "allowing" inspectors on private property without 1) permission of the owner; 2)  probable cause; 3) a warrant. Without probable cause (the suspicion of a crime) you couldn't get a warrant<

Since bee diseases are endemic -  and so in every hive - suspicion of disease can always be justified. The inspection is to check if the 'crime' is only at petty levels or sufficient to endanger the public interest. 

In other areas, eg UK,  inspection is arranged peaceably with the owners, who appreciate the overall benefits.  Someone else coming free to do all the hard work of a close examination – bring it on!   Surely it is just a matter of establishing good public relations?  

Or do perhaps some worried New York State beekeepers really have something exceptional to hide? 

 Robin 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2