Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:41:57 GMT |
Content-Disposition: |
inline |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Message-ID: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From: Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
>This is what Ellis, Hayes, and Ellis had to say:
Hi Peter,
There are a number of studies on small cell, and I think we should discuss them all.
However, you have been touting the most recent of the studies as recently as Saturday...and you have been doing so for over a year. I've only recently been able to actually read the study, so there was little to discuss.
I posted here a thoughtful critique of the study. Before I do the work to go through the Ellis/Hayes/Ellis study, I'd appreciate some substantive comment on the Seeley study. I posted a link to it, so you've certainly had the opportunity to review it in light of my critique. "the earth is round" hardly qualifies.
The silence is deafening, and I can't really see the point of citing studies and/or critiquing them if we can't actually discuss them as well.
deknow
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm
|
|
|