BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:59:01 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Bill Hesbach <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
>This low reproduction explains the slow rate at which mite populations grow in savannah honeybee colonies
and may constitute the major adaptation allowing for colony survival.


The interesting part about the Strauss hypothesis is that it seems to suggest that the mechanisms driving resistance in the bee actually modified the mite's ability to reproduce - "clear evidence for resistance was found in the low fertility, fecundity and reproductive success of Varroa mite foundresses". Is Strauss suggesting that the savannah mite in question became less virulent biologically as a result of some mechanism at work in the bee? Or is Strauss suggesting that in the savanna, natural selection favored less virulent mites? 



Bill Hesbach
Cheshire CT. 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2