BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:16:15 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<D1D040193BFF4919A7187CD5D1901F5F@bobPC>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Re 2,4-D:  No experience myself, Bob.  Here's what Cornell has to say:

Brood production was severely impaired when honeybees were fed moderate
doses, but, at lower levels of exposure they lived significantly longer than
the controls. The honeybee LD50 is 11.5 micrograms/bee.

Although recently manufactured 2,4-D technical acids have consistently been
free of dioxin contamination, the amine and ester products may have
measurable levels of some forms of dioxin. According to a study of 2,4-D
manufactured in Canada
(9<http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/extoxnet/24d-captan/24d-ext.html#9>),
of 26 amine samples tested, 8 were positive. The levels ranged from 5 ppb to
nearly 500 ppb. Several different forms of dioxin were present in the
different products. All but one of 21 ester samples were positive.
http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/extoxnet/24d-captan/24d-ext.html

Randy Oliver

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2