Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 20 Dec 1999 08:50:35 PST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Lactnuts,
When asked about the myths on bf site and direct maternal smoking as opposed
to passive smoking, Lisa shares "There was a strong negative effect
modification by breast feeding: relative odds of respiratory proneness with
maternal smoking were seven times higher among children who were never
breast fed than among those who were breast fed... "
While I do not dispute this, I also worry about what another poster said
about cotinine levels being high in infant's urine. So, playing devil's
advocate I will remind all: resp. problems may be less, but OTHER PROBLEMS
may be higher (?CNS,? Urinary tract). Therefore, I don't think we can be
reassuring, but comes back to the credo "mothers who bf should not smoke."
Laurie Wheeler, RN, MN, IBCLC - waiting for dh who resumed smoking this year
after 15 yrs of abstinence, to quit one day again
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|