Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 21 Mar 2000 10:14:44 EST |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ann relayed a story, which included this line:
<< The nurse today was upset because the little one was only nursing for ten
minutes and that "was NOT enough". >>
Another hot button pushed....and just when was the last time someone said to
the nurse, "I'm sorry, but you've only eaten for 7 minutes. It doesn't count
unless you eat for 22." We don't time ANYONE else! Why this emphasis on
being on the breast for x number of minutes. And suppose the baby was on the
breast for 20 minutes, but was only drinking for 6 and hanging out for 14. I
suppose the nurse would have been happy because the baby fulfilled the
requirement...or, would 20 minutes have been too long?
Jan B -- clock stomper in Wheaton
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|