LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
T Pitman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 30 Jan 2000 09:58:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
I don't work for a hospital but I have worked for the Canadian equivalent of
child protective services (usually called CAS or FACS here) for more than
ten years.

In that time, I have known of only one situation where a child was
"apprehended" because parents were going against medical advice. This was a
baby with cancer whose parents wanted to seek alternative treatments instead
of the surgery and chemotherapy recommended.

You would need to have (in my area, at least) some pretty convincing
evidence that the parents' "medical neglect" was dangerous to the baby in
order to request that the baby be apprehended. If the parents could show
that this was not a required procedure at another hospital, or if they could
show a study or some other evidence opposing the procedure, it would be hard
to make a case against them.

Teresa

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2