Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 4 Oct 1999 20:18:03 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Although I find that some parents really enjoy fingerfeeding, I have
yet to see any research showing that it is superior in any way to
bottlefeeding as a way to supplement. Why is putting a rigid finger
in the mouth to suck on better than a soft bottle nipple? The only
real difference I can see is that you may better be able to control
the flow of the liquid with fingerfeeding, for example, to reward a
baby for sucking properly. However, if a mom was not very
enthusiastic about finger-feeding I would certainly offer the
possibility of using a bottle (rather than having her give up entirely).
Now I would certainly be upset if someone were to upset a mother
who was happily fingerfeeding and lead her to believe that using a
bottle was better or that fingerfeeding was wrong.
Warmly,
Sharon Knorr, BSMT, LLLL, IBCLC
Newark, NY (near Rochester) USA
mailto:[log in to unmask]
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|