Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 6 Oct 1999 11:08:24 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Concerning finger-feeding vs. bottle-feeding:
My understanding of why finger-feeding is considered preferable is that
1) The baby's tongue is positioned more as it would be when nursing,
rather than pushed back as during bottle-feeding, providing better suck
training.
2) It's easy to transition from finger-feeding to the breast (during a
feeding session) as the tube can be used as a supplementer once the baby
latches.
3) (Never mind the baby, ) parents can become attached to the bottle as
an easy safety net.
As always, this decision depends on a lot of factors, including age of
the baby, parents' attitudes, why supplementing is necessary, etc. I
just hate to see finger-feeding presented as an option in an apologetic
way (as in, gee, I know this is SO much harder than the bottle, but....)
By the way, probably one reason that bottle-feeding is so much less
*awkward* is that everyone in this culture has seen it performed
thousands of times.
This is my first posting to LACTNET so I'll just just add that I'm a LLLL
from Minneapolis, enjoying all the LACTNET enthusiasm and wealth of
experience and viewpoints.
Marcia McCoy
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|