Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 21 Feb 1999 16:53:00 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Nikki writes:
>To add to the discussion of substance use, abuse, and parenting: a local
>pediatrician, Hallum Hurt, did a study looking at the aftermath of cocaine use
>in pregnancy. She found that poverty and an impoverished life made
neurobehavioral problems in those children, not that they had been exposed
prenatally to cocaine.
A study published last year in one of the main medical journals reported
that children exposed to cocaine use prenatally had an IQ deficit of 3
points compared to children from the same area (poor folks in Philadelphia)
who had not been exposed to cocaine prenatally. The average IQ score at age
4 in the cocaine-exposed group was 79, compared to 82 for the non-exposed
group. In other words, the 3 point loss from prenatal cocaine exposure was
insignificant compared to the 18 point loss from living "an impoverished
life." The authors of this study made a big stink about how the US needed
to spend millions more in special education and remedial language training
for these kids to overcome this 3 point deficit. Yet no one (except us)
seems to mind that formula-fed kids have an 8 point IQ deficit, on average.
Baffling.
Kathy Dettwyler
|
|
|