Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 22 Apr 1999 11:13:12 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
(I sent this before, bue it came back to me incomprehensible, so I am
resending it.)
Kathy D. asks:
Should the state insist that a mother breastfeed if there is a family
history of allergies, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and breast cancer?? In
other words, a situation where it is clear that formula-feeding puts the
child at unacceptable levels of risk of disease and death??
The answer is no, the state should not (and cannot) insist that a mother
breastfeed her child under any circumstances (at least none that I can
imagine in the US). The state cannot force a woman to use her own body to
sustain the life of another, even her own child. In fact, the state cannot
even compel a woman to give blood to save the life of her child. That isn't
to say there aren't some lower court judges that wouldn't try, but I know of
no higher court precedents that would support such a decision.
Rhonda Feder
Elkins Park, PA
lawyer, lay counselor in training
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|