LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Virginia Thorley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 16:23:19 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Dear Lactnetters,
    Has anyone out there a published reference about the reliability (or
otherwise!) of BF statistics, especially old ones, and espec. in
relation to (a) looseness of definitions, and (b) method of
date-collection.  I need something from a journal or report, for
something I am writing, and can't cite my own unpublished observations
in this instance.
    Would you email me privately, as well as on Lactnet, please.
    Thanks in  advance.
       Virginia

     Virginia Thorley, IBCLC,
     In Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, where the sky was blue
     when I came out this morning.


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2