LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Jan Barger RN, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Nov 1998 11:23:39 EST
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Diane writes:

<< But doggone, that $1435 figure is the exact number in the original Kaiser
 study.  So I suppose they didn't do their own study, just relied on the
 accuracy of Kaiser's.  So what do I do?  Stop highlighting that part?  The
 article sure makes a persuasive case to insurance companies... >>

Hey Diane!  You just report the news, you don't analyze it.  Just go for it.
If they choose to not do their own studies, that isn't YOUR problem.  And if
it's in the news, it must be correct, right????

Jan Barger -- the turkey is in the oven, the two kids are still asleep, and my
dh is picking up the pies at Baker's Square.  Hey -- a cook I'm NOT.  The
house is also decorated for C'mas -- we always bring out the C'mas china and
decorations on T'giving Day -- gets us in the holiday spirit....

ATOM RSS1 RSS2