Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LACTNET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LACTNET Home LACTNET Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
today's Guardian
From:
Heather <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Oct 1998 09:29:00 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
If you want to see misinformation of the highest order, go to:




http://reports.guardian.co.uk/articles/1998/10/15/27283.html


The Guardian is one of the UK's most respected liberal broadsheet
newspapers - and I write for it occasionally so it's not at all bad : ) -
but in this article the journalists involved have totally misinterpreted
the research, as anyone reading Lactnet will guess. The babies who were
studied were divided into three groups - formula fed, formula fed with
formula which included LCPUFAs, and (surprise surprise) breastfed. You will
not be amazed to learn that the top group of babies were the breastfed
ones. The 'plain powdered milk' cited in the newspaper was not a part of
the research - no one has used this for babies for at least a generation.

Of course I have responded. UK Lactnetters (and anyone else, of course)
might want to do the same.

Heather Welford Neil
NCT bfc Newcastle upon Tyne UK

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV