LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 May 1998 15:54:46 +0000
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
study on 6 hours
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
newman <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
cc: "Ilene Fabisch, BrocktonWIC" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines) 
I do know about the study, and the conclusion was not that it was more
"aggravating", presumably to the lungs.  They would not know that from
the study they did, if I am thinking of the right one.  What they
found was the amount of residual fluid in the stomach was greater than
what is generally accepted.  But that does not mean the baby should be
starved for 6 hours.  The Scheiner article takes care of that concern.

Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2