Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 1 Jun 1998 12:43:07 EDT |
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
well, now, see here is proof that using the archives will get you what you
want. at least in regards to posts, i don't know about life in general. now
before anybody gets busy "refuting" this study to me as happened last time i
posted this message, let me mention that i did not do this study and did not
read the actual study. the newspaper blurb was all i saw. go forth and
research the research.
carol
subject: yeast article j. of clinical microbiology july 1997
dear all,
while in sunny albuquerque, new mexico, a couple of weeks ago, i read a brief
article in the paper courtesy of the n.y. times news service about baker's
yeast causing thrush. yes, indeed, the "commercial strains of baker's
yeast, saccharomyces cerevisiae, can also cause (thrush)." microbiologists in
italy and the u.s. studied samples from women with thrush whose symptoms were
not caused by c. albicans. the 16 samples contained s. cerevisiae, and three
contained a yeast used for baking in italy. they suggest stricter hygiene,
i.e. handwashing, if using baking yeast. the article will be published in the
july issue of the journal of clinical microbiology.
carol brussel
private citizen
|
|
|