LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: LACTNET Digest - 22 Dec 1997 - Special issue
From:
IBCLC <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Dec 1997 17:45:39 EST
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Organization:
AOL (http://www.aol.com)
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
In a message dated 97-12-22 15:08:34 EST,  Sue Ann states

<< Certainly if a baby is dehydrated by day two (earlier than many, many
 mothers get their milk in), I would suspect other factors are involved. >>

One wonders if said baby was put under a warmer most of the time so he/she
experienced a LOT of insensible water loss.

One wonders if said nurses in said nursery know what dehydration is, or if
they decided the baby was dehydrated based on -- jeeze, let's see, what???

Jan B -- who is particularly frustrated with staff who scare mothers about
dehydration in 24 to 48 hours.  Sigh.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2