LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Apr 1998 12:21:49 -0500
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
From:
"J. Rachael Hamlet & Duncan L. Cooper" <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Does anyone know anything more about this?

In alt.support.breastfeeding, [log in to unmask] (Mynx) wrote:

>A proposed ban on nudity being considered this week by the House of
>Representatives here in South Carolina apparently would make outlaws
>of nursing mothers, students showering after gym classes and perhaps
>even babies having their diapers changed.
>
>The bill is designed by a religious morality group in order to quell
>things like strip clubs - in the process making any form of nudity
>illegal.  Women on the beach in revealing bathing suits, and even
>little naked children!
>
>The bill proposes that even nursing mothers fall under the category of
>indecent nudity and should be fined on a first offense, and possibly
>jailed for 6 months on the second.  There is mention of officers being
>able to use their own good judgement when deciding who to cite.
>
>Write letters and make your feelings known on this one!  You can find
>the SC districts and representatives at the following Yahoo url:
>
>http://www.yahoo.com/Regional/U_S__States/South_Carolina/Government/Elected_Off
>icials/U_S__Representatives/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2