Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jan 1998 07:36:40 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Yes, I read the whole issue. I'm wondering what these Inuit women are now
using to make their formula. Water laced with PCBs? So what is
worse-breastmilk or formula with PCBs?
Maurenne Griese, RNC, BSN, CCE, CBE
Birth and Breastfeeding Resources
Manhattan, KS USA
[log in to unmask]
----------
> From: Bruce Ackland <[log in to unmask]>
> To:
> Subject: Re: National Geographic
> Date: Saturday, January 11, 1997 11:55 PM
>
> Does anyone else read "National Geographic"?
> Vol.193, No.1 January 1998 p61-2 states
>
> "Because of contaminants, Inuit women don't breast-feed as much as they
> once did," Malcolm said.Women tested in the Canadian Arctic had about six
> times the amount of PCBs in their breast milk that women in urban areas
of
> Quebec Province did.
>
> The article is about Polar bears, but this info amazed me.
>
> Sue Ackland RN RM IBCLC
> Melbourne, Australia
>
|
|
|