LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Nursing vs Breastfeeding
From:
Ray & Jill Paoli <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 26 Oct 1997 23:15:40 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
Not sure if this has been posted yet, however I will continue! ;)
Apparently the wording "BREASTFEEDING ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA"  was
rejected by the Australian Post Master General as an unacceptable (or
possibly too explicit)  postal address-name back in the 1960's.  The
non-confrontational and ambiguous (in Australia) word of "Nursing" was
deemed eminently more appropriate.

Much lively and healthy debate does continue within NMAA and will
hopefully do so too in Lactnet.

Jill Paoli.

NMAA COUNSELLOR



Jill Paoli
NMAA COUNSELLOR

ATOM RSS1 RSS2