LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nick Azzaretti/Kate Pennington <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Jun 1997 02:44:38 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
The latest edition of Rachel's Environment & Health Weekly is an
article on "Toxics and Violent Crime." It summarizes research by Roger
D. Masters and co-workers at Dartmouth College on their "neurotoxicity
hypothesis"--their belief that toxic pollutants contribute to violent
crime. I don't know enough about science to be able to understand
whether the research is sound or the conclusions justified, but it is
fascinating reading. A few passages particularly caught my eye:

After explaining that manganese is toxic:
>Masters emphasizes that children who are raised from birth on
>infant formula and who are not breast fed will absorb five times
>as much manganese as breast-fed infants.  

and later:
>Because of increased manganese absorption by babies who drink
>infant formula and who are not breast fed, Masters considers
>infant formula toxic. 

The full Rachel Weekly article is on the Web
(http://www.monitor.net/rachel/r551.html).

The research referred to is Roger D. Masters, Brian Hone, and Anil
Doshi, "Environmental Pollution, Neurotoxicity, and Criminal
Violence," in J. Rose, editor, ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY (In press.
[London and New York: Gordon and Breach Publishers, 1997]).

Kate Pennington, Newcastle, Maine

ATOM RSS1 RSS2