Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 Sep 1997 13:07:43 +0900 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>I have just discovered that some midwives at my local hospital are
>still recommending binding breasts for engorgement and thought I
>would ask for some good arguments from all of you. I am giving a
>Breastfeeding update lecture next week and plan to include the topic
>to hopefully eliminate it from the hospital premises.
>Val in Busselton, Western Australia
>RN RM IBCLC
Val,
I suggest you check exactly what they mean by 'binding' before you say
anything. We have had a discussion about this before on Lactnet, I think.
To some people 'binders' are very tight, constricting things that are very
uncomfortable for the mother and don't really do much to help or suppress
lactation, while to others, they function like a firm, supportive bra, and
are comfortable for a mother with engorged breasts. The word 'binder' even
appears in some NMAA literature but it means the comfortable one.
******************************************************************
Joy Anderson B.Sc. Dip.Ed. Grad.Dip.Med.Tech. IBCLC
Nursing Mothers' Association of Australia Breastfeeding Counsellor
Perth, Western Australia. mailto:[log in to unmask]
******************************************************************
|
|
|