Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 23 Apr 1997 21:39:41 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Carol Brussel wrote:
>
> a few months ago i had a lll call but referred by a direct entry midwife (the
> same as lay or homebirth midwives).
>
Can someone please clarify the types of midwives? The midwife who
caught my last child, at home, is what I consider a "direct-entry
midwife"--she is not a nurse. She is, however, licensed by the state
(Washington) and refers to herself as a "Licensed Midwife" She attended
and completed a rigorous course from an established school of
midwifery. Not all states license DEM's. The birth I had in Washington
State would be illegal here in Virginia.
I'm not sure (here is where I need clarification) this is the same thing
as a "lay" midwife. My dictionary defines lay as "not belonging to a
given profession". I have always interpreted a "lay" midwife as being
synonymous with a "granny midwife", or someone with no formal training,
but rather hands-on or "on the job" training.
Shouldn't there be three types of midwives: CMN, LM and lay?
Just curious...
My midwife, by the way, was a member of LLL and, to the best of my
knowledge, never recommended anything concocted with goat's milk.
Kathy Koch, LLL Leader
Alexandria,VA
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|