LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MMR update
From:
Jack Newman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Feb 1997 07:42:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines) 
Sorry, forgot to say:  Why do we stand for this?  Why does the mother
have to produce evidence for something that is perfectly reasonable
(i.e. both getting the immunization together)?  The numbskulls are the
ones who should be producing the evidence that the baby is at risk from
getting "too much antigen".

Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2