LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Maryann Kusmirski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 31 Oct 1996 10:21:38 -0700
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (15 lines)
I think that Nancy and Patricia are correct when they refer to amount of
sunlight exposure. The article also made reference to a) the fact that the
children had received little sunlight B) this was one of the treatment
recommendations. My concern was that I feel the article took the "easy"
direction towards the recommedation that breastfeed babies need vitamin D
(unless they are receiving adequate amounts of sunlight exposure) I am not
sure how many busy physicians will assess sunlight exposure prior to
recommeding vit D supplementation. My belief is that the recommedations
could have been more effective if they contained health promotion
/education suggestions or a media campaign to all mothers (especially now
that Canada is in the start of snow season)
heading out to shovel snow in sunny Calgary, Alberta
Maryann Kusmirski BScN IBCLC
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2