Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 23 Feb 1997 04:39:05 +1100 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jack said:
>If that what it shows, of course it is a violation of the code. This is
>why compliance in one country (Australia), does not exonerate Nestle of
>all their evil (I mean that--babies die when they are not breastfed)
>marketing practices.
I agree entirely with every word of this. The debate however, is not about
whether all or any of the companies contribute to infant deaths: of course
they do. The debate is about what works to make real change so that babies
are breastfed, and what works to change market share; and whether people of
equal integrity can agree to disagree on strategies (not facts, goals or
principles) in a particular marketplace without one or other group feeling
the need to destroy the less-powerful dissenter.
Maureen Minchin, IBCLC
5 St, George's Rd., Armadale Vic 3143 Australia
tel/fax after March 1: 61.3.95094929 or 95000648
|
|
|