LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kathleen G. Auerbach" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Aug 1996 22:15:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Yes, there have been cases. I know of three such situations: two seem to
have disappeared (I wonder if this means they were settled out of court and
thus not a part of the "legal" record).

One other has recently been filed (hurrah! That means it will be heard!)
and lawyer involved is specifically interested in making this a case that
can then be referred to by others.

As I understand it, mother had specifically stated (more than once; records
in writing) that her baby was NOT to be given bottles or ABM. In spite of
that, this happened on more than one occasion. Outcome? Baby subsequently
refused to breastfeed and has had numerous health problems since then.

Case is being brought in an eastern municipality.  Stay tuned!  As a result
of this filing, I am now sharing this information with people at
conferences to alert them of the eventuality of this happening and the
importance of knowing CLEARLY what mothers want and not simply doing
something "because it has always been done."




Def. of LC service: "We are all faced with a series of great opportunities
brilliantly disguised as impossible situations."
Kathleen G. Auerbach,PhD, IBCLC (Homewood, IL)- [log in to unmask]
WEB PAGE: http://www.mcs.com/~auerbach/lactation.html
LACTNET archives http://library.ummed.edu/lsv/archives/lactnet.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2