Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 Apr 1996 00:35:30 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Anne,
Do you ever use intrathecals? Do you have any opinion on the relative
merit of intrathecal vs: epidural anesthesia?
Thanks in advance.
Jonathan
On Mon, 22 Apr 1996 09:26:59 -0700, Anne Montgomery wrote:
>Just a comment about labor pain: there is a difference between pain and
>suffering. I view my painful labor with satisfaction because I did not
>suffer--I had no fear, lots of support, and was thrilled with the result.
>Culture has a tremendous influence on the expression of suffering. I've
>cared for immigrant Hmong women giving birth--we knew it was time to put
>gloves on when they got beads of sweat on their foreheads as they never
>expressed discomfort. Suffering starts with anticipation of pain (all
>those horror stories people are willing to share with prenant women), and
>continues when other conflicts enter the birthing room. I'll take a doula
>over an epidural any day. However, I do use epidurals for my patients who
>are suffering in a way which is interfering with their ability to feel
>good about the birth process, and in those who have needed intervention
>such as pitocin and are having trouble tolerating it. These are always
>done with the mother's informed consent including information on the
>possible effects on the baby and breastfeeding initiation. Like all
>technology, epidurals have a specific place--unfortunately, they (like
>ABM) are used as a substitute rather than as an occasionally useful
>supplement for the "right stuff", adequate labor support.
|
|
|