Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LACTNET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LACTNET Home LACTNET Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 4 month solids
From:
Jan Barger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 21 Jan 1996 14:01:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Lisa,

Somewhere I read/heard/? that the reason for the 4-6 months was that ABM fed
babies needed the vitamins, iron, etc. that was in the solid foods at 4
months because the formula wasn't adequate for their needs beyond four
months.  Brfed babies didn't need it until around 6 months -- so as not to
offend anyone, the AAP made the recommendation 4-6 months so that it covered
everyone.  (But, maybe this is all wishful thinking on my part.  Anyone else
"hear" this?)

You're right; peds are more interested in the calendar (and the baby's total
weight) than they are in readiness cues.  Are we the ONLY ones that look at
what babies TELL us?

Jan B.
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV