Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LACTNET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LACTNET Home LACTNET Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
LATCH
From:
Sarah Barnett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 28 Aug 1995 12:49:55 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
I was at a session with Jan Riordan at LLL conference about
breastfeeding assessment tools.  There is poor inter-rater
reliability with both LATCH and MBA.  You might want to get a tape
of the session from LLLI (sesion 107) for a fuller discussion.
I think there are plans to publish the evaluation data soon.
Abstract conclusion from sesssion "Reliability coefficients for all
sment
three assessment tools are marginally acceptable indicating that they
measure both similar and different aspects of feedings at the breast.
Nurses are not reliable in measuring videotaped breastfeedings using
the IBFAT, the MBA and the LATCH but each nurse tends to consistently
score feedings the same way."
I would
 Sarah Barnett LLLL Bronx NY

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV