Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 9 May 1995 08:17:00 EST |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
MHS: Source date is: 09-May-95 09:24:00 -0300 EDT
======== Original Message ========
Thank you, Lisa Marasco, for your observation about sizes of breast shells.
That was one of theq uestions I asked, in addition to the instruction given
as to use (frequency, when in preganncy, for how long, etc.
If the Brits have only one size, they might not understand the significance
of the question. In any case, they never asnwered so I am still in the dark
about the issues you raised, as well as my own!
Perhaps someone will sign on to LACTNET from the British Isles and we can
pose the question to him/her/them. :-)
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% "We are all faced with a series of great %%
%% opportunities brilliantly disguised as %%
%% impossible situations" - definition of a %%
%% lactation consulting service. %%
%% Kathleen G. Auerbach, PhD, IBCLC %%
%% [log in to unmask] Homewood, Illinois USA %%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
======== Fwd by: Judy Canahuat ========
A couple of years ago, Chele Marmet told me and showed me the breast shells
that the Brits used in that study, and they truly were shells with much
larger openings then the shells we use here. I don't know if she followed
up with the authors of the study, but someone who has time might ask her.
|
|
|