Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 28 Oct 2015 08:14:05 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I absolutely agree: "implying that there is something wrong with a woman's
body before it is evident is not a benign intervention."
I hope any parent who has a discussion with me, about any red or yellow
flags for milk production issues, who walks away feeling that I have
informed them that there is "something wrong" with their body, gives me a
good swift poke in the ribs.
My post encouraged "a good clinician [to] use excellent parent-centered
communication skills." My approach (greatly abbreviated here, of course,
compared to a real face-to-face consultation) is to cover "You might have
supply isues, here is why I say that, and here is what to look for."
With IGT-signalling parents, I also spend a whole boatload of time
affirming and validating what marvelous things are happening (because
something marvelous always IS happening--we have a newborn!), and stress
over and over again that appearance is not proof -- it is a marker.
I go back to Cassar-Uhl's book. She did the research; she interviewed the
parents with IGT. They said: We want information about our bodies, and we
are entitled to get information about our bodies. I am persuaded.
To repeat: information never hurt anyone. But, please fer cyrin' out loud
-- let us all as clinicians impart information in an empowering (not
diminishing) manner.
Liz Brooks, JD, IBCLC, FILCA
Wyndmoor, PA, USA
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|