Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:15:35 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
<a06240800d14d7906cd35@[192.168.0.14]> |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>
>New babies are little open books - why should they not "bond" with
>mom's normal soaps/deos/perfumes rather than with sweat? And are we
>really sure that smell alone has that much influence on a baby's
>ability to latch and breastfeed? It's positioning and latching
>skills (which we can teach...) which allow breastfeeding to take
>place. Other animals have large olfactory centres in their brains,
>but our sense of smell is not one of our main survival skills...IME,
>having a non-bathed, unwashed mother is just not that important to
>breastfeeding success, whereas it's probably very important to her
>morale!
Agree, Pamela.
Hey, here's a great idea....why not *ask* the mother if she would
like a wash/shower and help her if she needs help? Gently offer a
bit of assistance getting into fresh nightwear, and be flexible and
responsive to what she wants.
Babies are responsive to smell (remember those experiments with the
milky breastpads wafted under newborn noses?) and it's not too much
of a stretch to think that a full-on douse with a powerful perfume
might not be a great idea, but the idea of an HCP telling a mother
no, she can't shower or bathe for some (arbitrary) time is a worse
one :)
Heather Welford Neil
NCT bfc, tutor, UK
--
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|