LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Date:
Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:54:01 +0000
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Pamela Morrison <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (169 lines)
In Medscape yesterday.  Enjoy!

Pamela Morrison IBCLC
--------------------------------
Medscape Medical News
Actions Alone May Improve Breast-feeding Rates
Nancy A. Melville  Nov 12, 2012 Authors & Disclosures

SAN FRANCISCO — The right interventions can 
improve breast-feeding rates at hospitals, even 
when motivation and knowledge are lagging, a new 
study shows. The results were presented here at 
the American Public Health Association 140th Annual Meeting.

The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, a joint 
effort of the World Health Organization and 
UNICEF, was designed to improve breast-feeding at 
hospitals worldwide. In the United States, it has 
had very limited impact; only about 5% of 
hospitals have achieved the status, compared with 
about 28% of hospitals in 152 countries worldwide 
and 31% in less-developed settings, according to 
research conducted by Miriam Labbok, MD, MPH, and 
colleagues ( Breastfeeding Med. 2012;7:210-222).

According to data from the Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention, in the first 2 days of 
life, hospitals provide formula to more than 25% 
of breast-fed infants born in the United States, 
which is known to undermine breast-feeding efforts.

"This tells us that something is going on in 
hospitals that is undercutting women's intention 
to breast-feed," said Dr. Labbok, who is director 
of the Carolina Global Breastfeeding Institute at 
the Gillings School of Global Public Health, 
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, in 
North Carolina, and lead author of the new 
research. "We're introducing a heck of a lot of 
formula in those first few days," she said.

The baby-friendly initiative encourages hospitals 
to adopt the 10 steps for successful 
breast-feeding measures.1.	Have a written 
breast-feeding policy that is communicated to all 
healthcare staff on a routine basis
2.	Train all healthcare staff in the skills necessary to implement this policy
3.	Inform all pregnant women about the benefits 
and management of breast-feeding
4.	Help mothers initiate breast-feeding within 30 
minutes of birth (by supporting immediate 
skin-to-skin attachment and baby-led first latch)
5.	Show mothers how to breast-feed and maintain 
lactation, even if they should be separated from their infants
6.	Give newborn infants no food or drink other 
than human milk unless medically indicated (first 
choice, breast-feeding by mother; second choice, 
expressed mother's milk; third choice, donor milk)
7.	Practice "rooming in," which allows mothers 
and infants to remain together 24 hours a day
8.	Encourage breast-feeding on demand
9.	Give no artificial teats or pacifiers to breast-feeding infants
10.	Foster the establishment of breast-feeding 
support groups and refer mothers to them on 
discharge from the hospital or clinic

Can Interventions Improve Breast-feeding Practices?

To better understand how the measures encourage 
breast-feeding at American hospitals, Dr. Labbok 
and her team evaluated 6 hospitals serving 
low-wealth populations that were not necessarily seeking baby-friendly status.

"There's a lot in the press about hospitals that 
tried to go after the baby-friendly designation, 
but there's not much in the literature about 
hospitals that are wishy-washy about it or low 
wealth, so we sought out those hospitals."

The hospitals were systematically assigned to 2 
groups that received an intervention on the 10 
steps: the first group received the intervention 
in 2009, and the second group received it in 2010 
(so it could serve as the control for the first year).

The results on breast-feeding rates, health 
worker knowledge, attitudes, and other factors at 
the first interim analysis in 2010 showed that 8 
of 10 steps had intervention-associated increases 
in breast-feeding and exclusive breast-feeding in 
the first group, compared with baseline.

The steps most closely associated with 
improvements in any breast-feeding were hospital 
policy, training, no supplementation of formula, 
and restricting artificial nipple use.

The steps of most importance to exclusive 
breast-feeding were policy, training, and 
immediate skin-to-skin attachment within 30 minutes of birth.

"It's interesting that immediate skin-to-skin 
attachment was so strongly associated with 
exclusive breast-feeding," Dr. Labbok said.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Actual Practice

The 2-year results showed that, although 
knowledge improved little, if at all, and 
attitudes improved only slightly in the 2 groups, 
the actual practice of breast-feeding did improve in both groups.

"What we saw, in terms of improvements in any 
breast-feeding, was that the [first] group...had 
a significant change in the year during the 
active intervention, and continued to increase thereafter," said Dr. Labbok.

The breast-feeding rate in the second group 
actually decreased in the first year, but in the 
second year, it increased at the same rate as the 
first group, "so the intervention clearly had a very good impact," she said.

The findings are striking in demonstrating that 
change is possible, even when enthusiasm is lackluster, she explained.

"What this tells us is that knowledge and 
attitudes may not be necessary to make practice 
changes that make the difference, even in 
settings where people are not really all on 
board," Dr. Labbok said. "This was unexpected, so 
it was a very interesting finding for us," she added.

"It is reflective of many other countries I've 
worked in where breast-feeding was dictated from 
above and people simply had to do it...whether 
they cared about it or had knowledge or not," she explained.

According to Melissa C. Bartick, MD, MS, from the 
Cambridge Health Alliance in Massachusetts, the 
suggestion that attitudes and knowledge will fall 
into place after actions are implemented, and 
might not be required beforehand, makes some sense.

"The findings are interesting, but in some ways 
not too surprising to me," said Dr. Bartick, who moderated the session.

"For many things, I think actions themselves are 
important drivers, and knowledge and attitudes do 
not always drive behaviors," she added.

"It's encouraging to know" that changes in 
attitudes "may not always be necessary, even if desirable," Dr. Bartick said.

Dr. Labbok and Dr. Bartick have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

American Public Health Association (APHA) 140th 
Annual Meeting. Abstract 259973. Presented October 29, 2012.

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2