HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lacey Babnik <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:40:38 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
If you haven't already, I'd contacted Bill Lindsey of the SHA's bottle
website directly with questions. For me, he was really responsive and
helpful.


Lacey


On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Benjamin Pykles <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hello list members:
>
> Recent excavations at a late 18th to mid-19th century domestic site in
> northeast Pennsylvania uncovered an isolated fragment of an amber-colored
> umbrella ink bottle. (I can email you a photo if you're interested). We are
> trying to determine the age of the bottle.
>
> We have consulted numerous sources, including the SHA Bottle website, which
> says (citing Faulkner [2009]) that umbrella inks were made for a very long
> time, starting at least as early as 1840 to as late as 1909. But every
> source we have consulted seems to suggest a similar "soft" starting date,
> using words like "at least as early as..." or "around." Some even leave
> open the possibility that this style of ink bottle could have begun decades
> earlier than the 1840s.
>
> Has anyone found similar umbrella ink bottles in tightly dated contexts? Is
> it possible that our fragment could date to the late 1820s?
>
> Please feel free to contact me off-list.
>
> Thank you for the help,
>
> Ben Pykles, Ph.D.
> [log in to unmask]
>



-- 
Lacey Babnik

ATOM RSS1 RSS2