Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 15 May 2012 14:11:18 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Janice,
I do believe though that the paper states that while the case is an amalgam that each element comes from an actual case- so I presume that a premature infant did contract CMV and die as a result of ingesting donor milk that had not bee frozen for a sufficient length of time. This sort of scenario is why organisations like hospitals need policies for dealing with peer-to-peer donations because otherwise it happens without the assistance of health professionals who know what sort of precautions might be necessary in an individual case.
Karleen Gribble
Australia
On 15/05/2012, at 6:25 AM, Janice Reynolds wrote:
> Jessica
> I believe you are referring to a paper called "The Ethics of Donor Human
> Milk Banking" by Lois Arnold which was published in the journal
> "Breastfeeding Medicine" Volume 1, Number 1, 2006. This paper utilizes a
> HYPOTHETICAL case, just as you outlined, to explore the ethical decisions
> involved.
>
> I have seen this happen before, that people have heard about this paper, and
> in their memories, it has become a REAL case. It is not. I sometimes
> wonder how much this mistake in recollection has influenced people's
> opinions about peer-to-peer milk sharing.
>
> I have a copy of the paper, I can email it to you directly if you like.
>
> Janice Reynolds
> Saskatchewan, Canada
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lactation Information and Discussion
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jessica Lang Kosa
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 12:49 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Points of view versus evidence
>
> On the subject of viruses- a couple of years ago at a conference a speaker
> alluded to a case of an infant dying of CMV after being nursed by the
> mother's sister. The inference was that the mother and hence baby were CMV
> negative, and the aunt was positive. My memory is that he thought the baby
> was directly breastfed by the aunt (not just fed the milk). I haven't
> found anything about this case in the literature - does anyone know if it is
> documented? (Or for that matter, if there is any documented case of
> morbidity/mortality due to virus transmission in a noncommercial, nonbank,
> milksharing situation?)
>
> ***********************************************
>
> Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
> To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
> Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
> COMMANDS:
> 1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set
> lactnet nomail
> 2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
> 3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
> 4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
>
> ***********************************************
>
> Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
> To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
> Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
> COMMANDS:
> 1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
> 2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
> 3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
> 4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|