LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Aug 2012 14:33:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Mary writes:

Neither  have any respiratory symptoms.  Since some of the chemical came in 
 contact with mom's skin and she also inhaled some of it, she is concerned  
about her milk.  The chemicals are:  
monoammonium phosphate  (55-65% concentration)
ammonium sulfate (30-40% concentration)
silica  and mica (<1-2% concentration)

My gut is that the absorption would  be low and likely not problematic for 
the baby.  I just thought I'd see  if anyone here has any prior experience 
with such an  issue.

~~~
I remember contacting Judith ( cannot remember her name, sorry) at the NYS  
Dept of Health in Albany years ago with a question about two moms who would 
be  working with volatile chemicals ( regularly: one was working with 
embalming  fluids, the other with paints) and the bottom line was there were more 
chemicals  being breathed out onto the baby than would be coming through 
the milk.  I  wonder if this is at all applicable. 
 
Peace,
Judy 

Judy LeVan  Fram, PT, IBCLC, LLLL
Brooklyn, NY,  USA
[log in to unmask]

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2