Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LACTNET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LACTNET Home LACTNET Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 May 2012 10:17:33 +0100
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: new study about pacifiers
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Sarah Vaughan <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
On 30/04/2012 14:13, Nikki Lee wrote:
> If m others can't use pacifiers to shut their babies up, they will use
> bottles of formula.
>
Nikki, the way you phrased this was unnecessarily judgemental and offensive.

I find it extremely unlikely that the majority of mothers who give 
pacifiers or formula do it 'to shut their babies up'.  I would say they 
do it because they correctly recognise that the babies need something, 
and they are trying to meet that need.  We can disagree over whether 
giving formula is necessarily the best *way* of meeting the babies's 
needs, but that doesn't make their *intentions* automatically more 
suspect than the intention of a mother who uses the breast for the same 
purpose.

Also, why assume the mothers were the ones instigating the formula 
supplements?  If this was happening in a hospital, it's perfectly 
plausible that the medical staff were the ones advising/pushing the 
bottles.  (Although the article says the hospital was trying to obtain 
Baby Friendly status, it doesn't say what other steps had been taken to 
achieve this.  Had the staff actually had any training on the importance 
of not being too hasty to push supplementation on a breastfed baby?  Or 
did someone just send round a 'no pacifier' memo in an attempt to try to 
set one relatively simple intervention into place in a situation where 
resources for further training weren't yet in place, and inadvertently 
set off a 'law of unintended consequences' situation?)

There's enough knee-jerk mother-blaming and stereotyping already in 
society.  Let's not be in such a rush to add to it.


Dr Sarah Vaughan
MBChB MRCGP

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV