Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 7 Apr 2012 18:55:16 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Listmates,
I too was shocked, I would even say incensed, when I just happened to come
across the document that Susan Burger mentions on the Healthy Children's
Center for Breastfeeding website. I came across this document while looking
for info on the DVD, "The Magical Hour." I am so glad I had read the ILCA
e-Globe and saw that this DVD was put out by Healthy Children.
The "Position Paper on the Comparative Roles of the IBCLC and the CLC" is
my opinion a slap in the face to every IBCLC who has had to get many hours
of 1 to 1 clinical consultation to be even able to sit for the exam.
This quote is from the first paragraph on the website
(_http://www.healthychildren.cc/index.cfm?show=clc_
(http://www.healthychildren.cc/index.cfm?show=clc) ) which discusses CLC training:
"The Certified Lactation Counselor®, (CLC) certification is the premier
National Certification in Lactation Management for the United States. CLC
certification holders have demonstrated competence in the lactation skills,
knowledge and attitudes that are essential to helping women in the United
States. The course and competencies have been evaluated by the ANCC who has
approved as Nursing Skills Competencies."
Would the average CLC know anything about posterior tongue tie or how to
adequately counsel a woman with low milk supply? Or the pregnant woman who
has had breast surgery and wants to know how to maximize her chances to
nurse her infant? A CLC I spoke with recently was not even aware that a
"professional grade pump" was not a hospital grade pump.
For many years I have thought that if an organization stands to profit
financially by certifying attendees of their five day course and then awarding
them 3/5 of the initials of an IBCLC when they pass a test, there is a
real ethical concern here. As for competency, shouldn't this be assessed in
real lactation situations, not in a didactic or a textbook learning
environment?
I also believe that this organization fought against legislative efforts
to make the IBCLC the stand alone credential for registration as a lactation
consultant in Massachusetts and I would love to be corrected on this point
if I am wrong.
There are many good CLCs and there are poor IBCLCs. But I believe that an
IBCLC should be the gold standard for the lactation consultant profession.
The CLC can be a pathway to the IBCLC, but it is not equivalent or
definitely not superior.
Mary-Jane Sackett, RN, IBCLC, RLC
Pittsfield, MA
***********************************************
Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
|
|
|