LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 16 Jul 2011 21:10:36 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Mary has told us about her state's plan to bypass the Baby Friendly designation for a state-created list of actions to impove breastfeeding in the hospital, and the reference to BFHI as a monopoly. This  monopoly reference sounds a lot like formula company language. I am sure that other hospitals have received the hard sell from formula manufacturers working to discourage them from becoming Baby Friendly. Baby Friendly is not a monopoly, it sets the standard of care for lactation support and services in a hospital. I find it interesting that other hospital credentialing programs, like magnet status from the American Nurses Credentialing Center, have not been referred to as a monopoly. While taking steps to improve breastfeeding care practices is important, watering down the Baby Frienly criteria does a disservice to mothers and babies by continuing to allow practices that are known to be detrimental to breastfeeding.

Marsha Walker, RN, IBCLC
Weston, MA   

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2